Month: October 2023

Right, (Right), you’re bloody well right, You got a bloody right to say

“We hold these truths self-​evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government.…”

– The Declaration of Independence

“All men by nature are equal in that equal right that every man hath to his natural freedom, without being subjected to the will or authority of any other man; being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.”

John Locke

Natural and Positive Law

There is a lot of confusion today as to what is a right. A right is defined as a moral or legal entitlement to have or do something.

Natural law is often contrasted with “positive” law, which is the law that is created by governments. Positive law can be different in different countries and can change over time. Natural law, on the other hand, is considered to be unchanging and universal.

Examples

  • Civil, Political or Legal Rights – are rights belonging to citizens or legal residents (e.g., to marry or to make contracts, vote or hold office) that have been granted by governments and can be changed or revoked by governments
  • Natural or Constitutional Rights – are innate, as growing out of human nature, or as required by one’s natural ends (e.g., rights to life, liberty, privacy (?), etc.). These are not granted by government and cannot be revoked.

Natural Law and Rights

Natural law is a system of law that is based on reason and the nature of human beings. It is a universal law that applies to all people, regardless of their culture or religion.

Natural rights are pre-existent rights that are inherent to all human beings and do not require approval from any government or other authority. They are universal, inalienable, indivisible, and interdependent. Rights belonging to all human beings universally also are termed human rights, a phrase often interchangeable with natural rights.

The concept of natural rights has its roots in ancient philosophy, but it was not until the Enlightenment era that it became widely accepted. Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued that all human beings are born with certain natural rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property. They believed that these rights are derived from human nature and are not dependent on any government or social contract.

Examples

Some examples of natural rights include:

  • The right to your own life, or self ownership (property, health)
  • The right to own property (possessions, property)
  • The right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion (liberty)
  • The right to freedom of opinion and expression (liberty)
  • The right to freedom of association and assembly (liberty)
  • The right to freedom from forced slavery or servitude (liberty)

Examples of civil, legal or political rights:

  • The right to participate in government
  • The right to marry someone
  • The right to enter into contracts

Claiming Doesn’t Make It So

No one can claim a natural right that is the result of another persons labor, as that would entail the forced labor of another person. Forced labor is a form of slavery or servitude which would be a violation of natural rights. These individuals have claims to their well-​being against all others. Such rights entail “positive” duties—that is, duties on the part of others, and hence the state, to provide them with welfare.

The right to freedom from slavery and servitude is a fundamental human right because it protects individual autonomy and dignity. It also protects individuals from being exploited and abused. Hence, someone cannot have a “right” to healthcare as that would mean they have the “right” to the healthcare workers labor.

Examples

Just because a right is claimed does not make it a right. Examples of “claimed rights:”

  • The right to education, which requires the labor of the teacher
  • The right to health care, which requires the labor of a nurse or physician
  • The right to work, which requires an employer
  • The right to social security, only you can ensure your own security
  • The right to cultural life, depends upon the community
  • The right to a clean environment, again depends upon the community

Hence, these are not innate rights or rights that you are born with. All of these could be fulfilled through voluntary association with others who are willing to participate. These might better expressed as:

  • The right to educate ones’ self
  • The right to monitor and improve your own health
  • The right to your own work
  • The right to save for the future as you see fit
  • The right to live in the culture of your choice or to create your own
  • The right to ensure that your own environment is safe and healthy

Natural rights are important because they protect individual freedom and promote human dignity. They are also essential for a just and equitable society. Governments have a responsibility to protect and promote natural rights, but they cannot create or take them away.

Natural rights are also important for understanding the role of government in society. Governments are not the creators of natural rights, but rather the protectors of natural rights. Governments have a responsibility to safeguard a society in which all people can enjoy their natural rights. Remember that a government that “grants” a right can also take it away.

The halo effect and the fundamental attribution error: Two cognitive biases that can cloud our judgment

“I have self-actualized. Pardon me whilst I adjust my glowing halo.”

Ted Nugent

Cognitive biases are mental shortcuts that can lead to errors in thinking. They can cause us to misinterpret information, make bad decisions, and judge others unfairly.


The halo effect and the fundamental attribution error are two common cognitive biases that can cloud our judgment.

The halo effect is a cognitive bias that causes us to make judgments about someone’s character based on a single positive trait. For example, if someone is attractive, we may be more likely to assume that they are also intelligent, kind, and trustworthy.

The fundamental attribution error is a cognitive bias that causes us to overestimate the influence of personal factors and underestimate the influence of situational factors on people’s behavior. For example, if we see someone cut us off in traffic, we may be more likely to assume that they are a rude and aggressive driver, rather than considering that they may be in a hurry or distracted.


The halo effect and the fundamental attribution error can have a significant impact on our lives. They can affect our decision-making at work, in our relationships, and in our personal finances. They can also lead us to make bad choices about our health, our safety, and our environment.


Here are some examples of how the halo effect and the fundamental attribution error can play out in real life:

  • A job interviewer may be more likely to hire a candidate who is attractive, even if their qualifications are not as strong as other candidates.
  • A teacher may be more likely to give good grades to a student who is well-behaved, even if their academic work is not as strong as other students.
  • A police officer may be more likely to pull over a driver who is wearing baggy clothes and a baseball cap, even if they are not driving erratically.
  • A voter may be more likely to vote for a candidate who is charismatic and well-spoken, even if their policy positions are not aligned with the voter’s values.

It is important to be aware of the halo effect and the fundamental attribution error so that we can avoid being misled by them. When we are making judgments about others, it is important to consider all of the information available, not just a single trait or situational factor.


Here are some tips for avoiding the halo effect and the fundamental attribution error:

  • Be aware of your own biases. Once you are aware of your biases, you can start to take steps to avoid them.
  • Consider multiple perspectives. When making a judgment about someone, try to see things from their perspective.
  • Be skeptical of your first impressions. First impressions can be powerful, but they are not always accurate.
  • Be open to new information. Don’t let your existing biases prevent you from considering new information that may challenge your beliefs.

By following these tips, you can learn to make more informed and objective judgments about others.

Ad hominem and tu quoque: Two common logical fallacies

“Ad hominem is a notoriously weak logical argument. And is usually used to distract the focus of a discussion – to move it from an indefensible point and to attack the opponent.”

Lord Aquitainus Attis ~ Furies of Calderon by Jim Butcher

Ad hominem and tu quoque are two common logical fallacies that are often used in arguments. They are both fallacious because they attack the person making the argument instead of the argument itself.

Ad hominem and tu quoque fallacies are often used in political debates and in advertising. They can be effective because they make it easy to attack an opponent’s character, even if that attack is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

Ad Hominem

Ad hominem is a Latin phrase that means “to (or against) the person.” It is a type of logical fallacy that attacks the person making the argument instead of the argument itself. For example, an ad hominem attack might be something like, “You can’t trust what he says, he’s a convicted felon.”

Examples:

  • “You can’t trust what she says, she’s a conservative.”
  • “He’s a climate change denier, so we shouldn’t listen to his opinion on science.”
  • “She’s a single mother, so she doesn’t have time to be on the school board”

Tu quoque

Tu quoque is a Latin phrase that means “you too.” It is a type of ad hominem attack that accuses the person making the argument of hypocrisy. For example, a tu quoque attack might be something like, “You say I’m lazy, but you’re always sleeping in.”

Examples:

  • “You say we should eat healthy, but you’re always eating junk food.”
  • “You’re criticizing me for being a hypocrite, but you’re a hypocrite yourself.”
  • “You say we should reduce our carbon emissions, but you drive a gas-guzzler.”

It is important to be aware of ad hominem and tu quoque fallacies so that you can avoid being misled by them. When someone is trying to persuade you, ask yourself if they are attacking the person making the argument or the argument itself. If they are attacking the person, then be careful not to let them fool you.

Tips

Here are some tips for avoiding ad hominem and tu quoque fallacies in your own arguments:

  • Focus on the argument itself, not the person making the argument.
  • Avoid using personal attacks or insults.
  • Be respectful of the other person, even if you disagree with them.

By following these tips, you can have more productive and informative conversations.

There’s a Method to the Madness

“I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”

Michael Crichton

What is the scientific method?

The scientific method is a process for experimentation that is used to explore observations and answer questions. It is a systematic way to gather evidence and draw conclusions about the natural world. The scientific method is based on the idea that all natural phenomena are caused by physical or chemical processes, and that these processes can be understood through observation and experimentation.

The scientific method typically involves the following steps:

  • Ask a question. This is the first step in any scientific investigation. It is important to ask a clear and concise question that can be answered through experimentation.
  • Do your research. Once you have asked a question, it is important to research what is already known about the topic. This will help you to develop a hypothesis and to design an experiment.
  • Form a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon. It is important to make a hypothesis that is specific and testable.
  • Design an experiment. An experiment is a test of a hypothesis. It is important to design an experiment that is fair and controlled.
  • Collect data. Data is the information that is collected during an experiment. It is important to collect data carefully and accurately.
  • Analyze the data. Once the data has been collected, it needs to be analyzed to determine whether or not it supports the hypothesis.
  • Draw a conclusion. Based on the analysis of the data, the scientist can draw a conclusion about whether or not the hypothesis is supported. If the hypothesis is supported, the scientist can accept it as a tentative explanation for the phenomenon. If the hypothesis is not supported, the scientist can reject it and develop a new hypothesis.

It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s … a tool

The scientific method is a powerful tool for learning about the natural world. It is used by scientists in all fields, including biology, chemistry, physics, and geology. The scientific method has helped us to understand many of the fundamental processes of the universe, and it continues to be used to make new discoveries every day.

Here are some examples of the scientific method in action:

  • A scientist wants to know if a new drug is effective in treating a certain disease. They design an experiment in which one group of patients is given the new drug and another group is given a placebo. The scientist then compares the results of the two groups to see if the new drug is effective.
  • A biologist wants to know how different plants respond to different amounts of water. They design an experiment in which they grow plants in different conditions and then measure the growth of the plants. The biologist then analyzes the data to see how the amount of water affects the growth of the plants.
  • A chemist wants to know how a certain chemical reacts with another chemical. They design an experiment in which they mix the two chemicals together and then observe the reaction. The chemist then analyzes the results of the experiment to see how the two chemicals react.

The scientific method is an essential part of the scientific process. It is a systematic way to gather evidence and draw conclusions about the natural world. The scientific method has helped us to understand many of the fundamental processes of the universe, and it continues to be used to make new discoveries every day.

Sources

The Method

Analyze this!

“It´s one thing to enjoy a story, but it´s quite another to take it for the truth.”

Patrick Rothfuss, The Wise Man’s Fear

How to critically analyze internet news, articles, and stories using reason and logic

The internet is a vast resource of information, but it can also be a breeding ground for misinformation and disinformation. It is important to be able to critically analyze the information you find online, especially when it comes to news, articles, and stories.

Here are some tips on how to critically analyze internet news, articles, and stories using reason and logic:

  • Identify the source. Who is the author or publisher of the information? Are they a credible source? What is their purpose in writing this article?
  • Consider the evidence. Is the information supported by evidence? Is the evidence credible?
  • Be aware of bias. It is important to be aware of bias in the information you find online. Bias can come in many forms, such as political bias, cultural bias, and personal bias.
  • Evaluate the argument. Is the argument logical and well-reasoned? Are there any logical fallacies?
  • Check the facts. If possible, check the facts in the article with other sources.

Here are some additional tips for critically analyzing internet news, articles, and stories:

  • Look for multiple perspectives. Read articles from different sources with different viewpoints. This will help you to get a more complete understanding of the issue.
  • Be skeptical of sensational headlines. Sensational headlines are often designed to grab your attention, but they may not be accurate.
  • Be aware of your own biases. We all have biases, and it is important to be aware of them so that they don’t cloud our judgment.

By following these tips, you can learn to critically analyze internet news, articles, and stories using reason and logic. This will help you to avoid being misled by misinformation and disinformation.

Here are some specific examples of how to use reason and logic to critically analyze internet news, articles, and stories:

  • If an article claims that a new study has found that something is harmful, ask yourself the following questions:
  • What is the sample size of the study?
  • Is the sample representative of the population?
  • What is the quality of the research design?
  • Are the results of the study statistically significant?
  • If an article claims that a politician is lying, ask yourself the following questions:
  • What is the evidence to support the claim?
  • Is the evidence credible?
  • Are there any other possible explanations for the politician’s behavior?
  • If an article claims that a new product is revolutionary, ask yourself the following questions:
  • What is the evidence to support the claim?
  • Is the evidence credible?
  • Are there any other products on the market that do the same thing?

By asking these kinds of questions, you can use reason and logic to critically analyze internet news, articles, and stories. This will help you to avoid being misled by misinformation and disinformation.

It is also important to remember that not everything you read on the internet is true. If you are unsure about the accuracy of an article, it is always best to fact-check it with other sources.

See previous post:

Research

Let me philosophize about that…

“Don’t explain your philosophy. Embody it.”

Epictetus

Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. It is a rational and critical inquiry that reflects on its own methods and assumptions.

Philosophers have asked questions such as:

  • What is the nature of reality?
  • What is knowledge?
  • What is the good life?
  • What is the relationship between mind and body?
  • What is the meaning of life?

These are just a few examples of the many questions that philosophers have grappled with over the centuries.

Philosophy is not a science in the sense that it does not produce empirical evidence. Instead, philosophy relies on reason and argument to develop its theories. Philosophers often use counterexamples and thought experiments to test their theories and to challenge the theories of others.

Philosophy is an important discipline because it helps us to think critically about our beliefs and assumptions. It also helps us to develop our critical thinking skills, which are essential for success in all areas of life.

Here are some examples of philosophical questions that have been debated for centuries:

  • Does God exist?
  • What is the nature of consciousness?
  • What is the free will problem?
  • What is the relationship between ethics and politics?
  • What is the meaning of art?

Philosophy is a complex and challenging discipline, but it is also a rewarding one. By studying philosophy, we can learn to think more clearly and critically about the world around us. We can also develop a deeper understanding of ourselves and our place in the world.

Sources brainly.in/question/17161807

Finding out “why”, “what”, “how”, “when”…

“Research is something that everyone can do, and everyone ought to do. It is simply collecting information and thinking systematically about it.”

Raewyn Connell

How to research issues on the internet

The internet is a vast resource of information, but it can also be overwhelming and difficult to know where to start when researching an issue. Here are some tips on how to research issues on the internet effectively:

  1. Start with a clear research question. What do you want to learn about the issue? Once you have a clear question, you can start to narrow down your search.
  2. Identify credible sources of information. Not all information on the internet is created equal. It is important to identify credible sources of information, such as government websites, academic journals, and news articles from reputable news organizations.
  3. Evaluate the information you find. Once you have found some sources of information, it is important to evaluate them critically. Consider the following questions: Who is the author or publisher of the information? Are they credible sources? What is the purpose of the information? Is the information up-to-date? Is the information supported by evidence?
  4. Take notes. As you are researching, take notes on the information you find. This will help you to keep track of your sources and to organize your thoughts.
  5. Synthesize the information. Once you have finished researching, it is important to synthesize the information you have found. This means putting all of the pieces together to form a complete understanding of the issue.

Here are some additional tips for researching issues on the internet:

  • Use multiple search engines. Different search engines index different websites, so using multiple search engines can help you to find a wider range of information.
  • Use advanced search features. Most search engines offer advanced search features that can help you to refine your search results. For example, you can search for information from a specific date range or from a specific website.
  • Use fact-checking websites. There are a number of websites that specialize in fact-checking. These websites can help you to verify the accuracy of information that you find online.
  • Be aware of bias. It is important to be aware of bias in the information that you find online. Bias can come in many forms, such as political bias, cultural bias, and personal bias.

By following these tips, you can research issues on the internet effectively and avoid being misled by misinformation.

© 2025 Free Thought

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑